Pockets: A Gendered History

If you look at the clothing of men and women, you will notice a strange difference: pockets. Historically, men’s trousers and coats were filled with deep, functional pockets. Women’s clothing, however, often lacked them, relying instead on small handbags. This was not just about fashion; it was a way to control how much space women occupied in the world.

The Tie-On Pocket

In the 17th and 18th centuries, women actually wore "pockets," but they were separate items. These were bags that tied around the waist under their skirts. Through a slit in the fabric, women could reach in and grab their keys, money, or sewing kits. They were hidden, secret, and incredibly useful.

The Shift in Style

When fashion changed in the late 18th century, skirts became much slimmer. The bulky tie-on pockets ruined the new, elegant silhouette. Instead of building pockets into the dresses, fashion designers created the "reticule"—a small, delicate bag that had to be carried in the hand. Suddenly, women had to carry their belongings in a way that was visible and less secure.

The Message in the Fabric

This change carried a social message. A man’s pocket was a tool for work, travel, and independence. A woman’s handbag was an accessory that kept her hands busy. For a long time, not having pockets meant that women were dependent on someone else to carry their things or were limited in what they could take with them when they left the house.

The Modern Movement

Today, the fight for pockets is a real movement. Many women are tired of fake pockets or tiny, useless ones that cannot even hold a smartphone. Clothing brands are slowly listening, adding functional pockets to trousers and dresses. It is a small change, but it is one that gives women more freedom and utility in their everyday clothes.